Brand new USAID Report on Private Sector’s part in Sustainability and Scale: 5 key takeaways through the Enduring Results Study

Another Great Coffee Blog!

The recently released Enduring outcomes Study 3.0 led by CRS assumes a job that few jobs have actually the blissful luxury of doing – it requires a look that is retrospective project outcomes two years after funding has ended to evaluate drivers of sustainability and scale. Drawn from 29 USAID partnerships with the sector that is private the ERS 3.0 could be the 3rd iteration of the research and examines the traits of partnerships that sustained their results and also the part of most lovers in allowing enduring results. The outcomes that emerge point professionals in brand new instructions for engaging aided by the sector that is private suggest best practices for anyone – private sector, public sector, or civil society – engaged in work with value chains.


USAID has committed to a major cultural and operational transformation in the way it collaborates with the sector that is private. The 2018 Private-Sector Engagement Policy calls on applying lovers to “be during the forefront of searching for and proposing market-based approaches to deal with development and humanitarian challenges” and, included in this shift that is cultural has committed to a Private  Sector Engagement Evidence and Learning Plan to deepen the body of evidence about what works – and doesn’t – in engaging with the private sector.

The Enduring Results Studies have focused on the continuity of intended activities and/or outcomes that begin while USAID is actively supporting and funding the partnership and that sustain for at the least 2 yrs after USAID’s support has formally ended. Initial two studies (ERS 1.0 and ERS 2.0) collectively centered on 50 USAID sector that is private that ended in fiscal year 2014 and 2015, respectively, while the ERS 3.0 performed a detailed analysis on 29 private sector partnerships that ended in 2017.

Of These 29 partnerships, 28 demonstrated sustained results by the definition above while 18 were able to scale their results following the final end for the task. These five key takeaway messages provide practical recommendations to practitioners in the field.

Market-oriented while the full summary report provides more detailed information approaches drive scale post-partnership

It may come as surprise that is little whenever personal sector lovers take part in partnerships that advance their market passions, they truly are almost certainly going to measure and maintain. Inside the research test, 12 for the 17 (71%) market-oriented partnerships scaled results or tasks when USAID money finished, unlike the non-market-oriented partnerships where just 6 of 11 (54%) scaled. Unlike more philanthropic-oriented jobs, personal sector lovers had a vested curiosity about seeing the prosperity of the partnership carry on long-lasting and frequently accomplished this scale in task results by developing brand new market linkages or allowing brand new consumer portions. In addition, partnerships with market-oriented approaches often scaled without involvement of extra lovers or donors, rather counting on personal sector actors and beneficiaries alone. This shows that engaging actors straight tangled up in value chains, particularly the ones that benefit straight from their store, could be a way that is good ensure sustainability and scale post-project. 2.

Private sector actors that contribute their most distinctive assets support scaling

For the ERS 3.0 study, partnerships were categorized according to the types of assets that each actor contributed. Highly distinctive assets were defined as assets that were unlikely to have been as effective coming from other partners, such as relationships, brand value, or proprietary information that are unique to a sector partner that is private. In comparison, less distinctive assets include efforts that may attended from any star and had the effect that is same such as funding. 

Partnerships where the private sector partner contributed highly distinctive assets scaled more often than partnerships where less distinctive assets came from the sector that is private. The private sector actor contributed a highly distinctive asset in the form of its white hybrid variety maize seeds for example, in the Ghana Advanced Maize Seed Adoption partnership. Of the partnerships where sector that is private contributed distinctive assets, 76% (13 away from 17) scaled, much more compared to 45% (5 away from 11) of jobs where personal sector actors contributed less distinctive assets such as for instance money.

This shows that personal sector actors have actually a variety that is large of to bring to the table – focusing exclusively on their monetary contributions is not likely to yield the best results. Instead, consider assets that are highly distinctive personal sector actors could contribute when engaging with prospective lovers across value chains. 

3. Neighborhood sector that is private were more likely to continue their contributions to sustaining success

The ERS 3.0 study included a mix of projects with local or international private sector actors; 14 projects included local private sector partners while 15 included global private sector partners. The difference in contributions post-partnership was dramatic – 93% of the local sector that is private proceeded their efforts (of most forms of assets, see above), while just 57% of international personal sector lovers proceeded their participation. Most of the time, partnerships that involved international personal sector lovers had the ability to maintain their results through the continued participation of beneficiaries or federal government lovers, as opposed to through the sector that is private. 

It is easy to understand local sector that is private’ motivation for continuing their participation as 100% of those partnerships had been aligned making use of their commercial passions. These partnerships usually suffered through establishing or market that is expanding, as many value chains projects attempt to do. This finding suggests that the place that is best to start out in search of personal sector lovers is often near to target communities. The commercial interests of local, national, and/or regional private sector actors may be key drivers of success in sustaining linkages and benefits post-project while international private sector partners have an important role to play in creating global market linkages. 

4. Engaging government and beneficiaries in private sector partnerships also facilitated results that are enduring*)Alongside private sector actors, federal government and target community actors had been additionally critical to your success of several for the partnerships examined. Of this 28 partnerships that sustained outcomes, 19 (68%) involved beneficiaries into the implementation or design of activities. For example, the Low Emissions Cattle Farming partnership in Costa Rica worked with farmers to trial and demonstrate livestock emissions reduction initiatives, who then gave their feedback and recommendations to the government that is national this new techniques become incorporated into their nationwide strategy. National actors perform a role that is critical scaling partnerships as well, which can happen when government stakeholders scale partnerships through funding, policy change, or integration into systems and structures. Public sector actors played a role in scaling 10 of the 18 (56%) partnerships that achieved scale after USAID involvement ended.

Engaging government actors and beneficiaries in project design are best practices that apply to sector that is private aswell. These findings declare that attaining buy-in and a vision that is common private, public, and community stakeholders can be an important step in creating successful projects that produce sustainable results.

5. In the most successful projects, private sector partners were included from the beginning 

In the partnerships included in ERS 3.0, private sector actors played a key role in developing project activities, with 17 of the 29 (59%) partnerships initiated by private sector actors. These projects were more likely to sustain and scale than those initiated by other actors, as seen below. In addition, 75% of sustained partnerships and 78% of scaled partnerships were based on pre-existing relationships between the sector that is private applying lovers or USAID. 

This outcome is suggestive for the role that is increasing of sector actors in driving the development of their communities. Including their perspectives from the outset – rather than bringing them to the table at the minute that is last is more prone to be successful. In addition, cultivating relationships with personal sector actors which do not revolve round the task period can cause possibilities for ongoing discussion and personal projects that are sector-initiated. Evidence from the ERS 3.0 report suggests that these types of partnerships are more likely to sustain and scale.


This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Accenture Development Partnerships with input from the United States Agency for International Development and Catholic Relief Services as part of the LASER Buy-In: Building the Evidence Base on effective sector that is private Phase 2 venture and will not fundamentally mirror the views for the united states of america Agency for Global developing or the United States Government. This research is carried out beneath the Assistance that is long-term and for Research Partners for University-led Solutions Engine (LASER PULSE) project. The task is funded by the usa Agency for Global developing (USAID), under Cooperative contract AID-7200AA18CA00009.